|   | 
			
			
				
					|   | 
					
					PROJECT SYNDICATE THE WORLD'S OPINION 
					PAGE 
					AUG 28, 2014 
					YURIKO KOIKE, 
					Japan's former defense minister and national security 
					adviser, was Chairwoman of Japan's Liberal Democratic 
					Party's General Council and currently is a member of the 
					National Diet. 
					 
					Ending East Asia’s History Wars 
					 
					TOKYO – Georges Clemenceau, who, as France’s prime minister, 
					led his country to victory in World War I, famously said 
					that “war is too important to be left to the generals.” 
					Japan is now discovering that history is too important to be 
					left to newspaper editors. 
					 
					In the 1990s, the newspaper Asahi Shimbun caused a firestorm 
					at home and in South Korea by publishing a series of 
					articles, based upon testimony by the former Japanese 
					soldier Seiji Yoshida, on “comfort women” – Koreans forced 
					to provide sexual services to the Japanese Imperial Army 
					during World War II. Asahi has now admitted that the 
					soldier’s confessions were unfounded, and has disavowed the 
					core supporting evidence for the articles. 
					 
					That retraction appears to be causing as much embarrassment 
					– and diplomatic vitriol – in Japan and South Korea today as 
					the original series did. But, at a time when both countries 
					cannot afford to permit partisan or sloppy abuses of history 
					to roil their bilateral relations, Asahi’s careless work has 
					turned out to be more than abysmal journalism; it has 
					introduced a dangerous element into regional diplomacy. 
					 
					Some say that Japan and South Korea should follow the 
					example set by France and Germany. Reconciling in the first 
					two decades following the Nazi Occupation of France, these 
					countries’ leaders understood that their security and 
					economic ties were far too important to their citizens’ 
					wellbeing to allow the old hatreds to fester. They knew that 
					the unimaginable violence of WWII was a direct result of the 
					antagonisms that had festered since the Napoleonic Wars and 
					that were allowed to persist after 1918. 
					 
					In Charles de Gaulle and Konrad Adenauer, France and Germany 
					had two of the twentieth century’s greatest statesmen, 
					leaders who were able to discern the broad sweep of history 
					through the fog of quotidian politics. Their loyalty was not 
					only to the citizens who elected them, but also to the 
					generations of the past that had endured the consequences of 
					Franco-German enmity, and to generations yet to come, which 
					would benefit from reconciliation. 
					 
					Of course, given that Japan and Korea have not fought a 
					series of wars against each other, their relationship is not 
					the same as that between Germany and France. But it is clear 
					that no one will benefit from a new round of heated 
					historical debate. To avoid this, political leaders like de 
					Gaulle and Adenauer are needed. Only when we can discuss the 
					past without endangering the future will the countries of 
					Northeast Asia be able to establish a truly durable 
					structure of peace. 
					 
					As Admiral Dennis C. Blair, a former commander of the US 
					Pacific Fleet, stated at a recent conference, “The history 
					of Asia from the 1930s to about 1955 or so was not pretty in 
					any way….I don’t think any country can have a monopoly on 
					righteousness, or on guilt and shame” for that time. Blair 
					added that “the attempt to hold a ‘we were right’ and ‘you 
					were wrong’ sweepstakes is not going to help our children 
					and grandchildren understand what happened there.” 
					 
					Japan and South Korea need to take responsibility for the 
					future, not obsess about the past. A recent Japanese 
					government white paper called South Korea the country “that 
					shares the closest relationship with Japan historically and 
					in areas such as economy and culture.” No doubt, many, if 
					not most, South Korean foreign-policy experts and 
					strategists share that sentiment. But it will take committed 
					leadership to transcend the history wars and tap the full 
					potential of Japanese-Korean cooperation, something that 
					both countries’ key ally, the United States, strongly 
					desires, as it seeks to draw China into a lasting and 
					peaceful Asian order. 
					 
					For too long, intemperate historical debates – often driven 
					by biased newspaper accounts – have poisoned bilateral 
					relations. Now, as another war of words heats up, Japanese 
					and South Korean leaders need to step back, recognize where 
					the real interests of their people lie, both today and in 
					the future, and calmly begin to take the measures required 
					to ensure durable reconciliation. 
					 
          
					return to the page indicating this page 
					  | 
					  | 
				 
			 
			 | 
			  |